Concrete-Apprehension
0x2b064e1415c2fd4239c16e5ccf1d2730bab91dad
Wallet digest
Activity score
63/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
8
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.2K
Realised
$662.86
Win rate
83%
6 closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will "Superman" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 60–69?
2115 shares @ 4.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 11, 2025$0.00
$-86.67
- NO
Will "Superman" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 80–89?
1752 shares @ 44.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 11, 2025$0.00
$-775.22
- YES
Will "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?
1000 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 18, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- NO
Will "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be less than 30?
996 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 18, 2025$0.00
$-597.86
- YES
Will "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 50–59?
952 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 18, 2025$0.00
$-95.24
- YES
Will "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 40–49?
933 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 18, 2025$0.00
$-93.27
- YES
Will "Superman" Rotten Tomatoes score be 90 or higher?
464 shares @ 22.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 11, 2025$0.00
$-102.85
- YES
Will "Superman" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 75–79?
223 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 11, 2025$0.00
$-6.68
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 50–59?$5.57Jul 27, 19:33 UTC
- REDEEMWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 40–49?$36.12Jul 27, 19:33 UTC
- REDEEMWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$190.51Jul 27, 19:33 UTC
- REDEEMWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 60–69?$403.17Jul 27, 19:33 UTC
- REDEEMWill "Superman" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 70–74?$672.41Jul 27, 19:33 UTC
- REDEEMWill 'Superman' have the best domestic opening weekend in 2025?$979.14Jul 27, 19:33 UTC
- REDEEMWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be 70 or higher?$1.2KJul 27, 19:33 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Superman be the top grossing movie of 2025?$308.07Jul 27, 19:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$0.70Jul 16, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$49.43Jul 16, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$2.07Jul 16, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$2.50Jul 16, 16:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$45.30Jul 16, 16:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$5.00Jul 15, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 60–69?$1.50Jul 14, 13:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 50–59?$3.90Jul 14, 13:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$1.91Jul 13, 17:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 30–39?$15.50Jul 12, 22:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 40–49?$15.00Jul 11, 19:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Smurfs" Rotten Tomatoes score be between 40–49?$3.00Jul 11, 18:22 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $14.26
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 9, 07:29 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 27, 19:33 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".