Vigilant-Pseudocode
0x2b40316ca9b744fac2c98be7b5342b4321474866
Wallet digest
Activity score
48/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
31
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.2K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 31- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:20AM-2:25AM ET
757 shares @ 42.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-320.53
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 22, 4:40AM-4:45AM ET
703 shares @ 15.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-106.54
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 22, 4:50AM-4:55AM ET
693 shares @ 26.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-185.39
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 22, 4:45AM-4:50AM ET
409 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-135.06
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:05AM-3:10AM ET
400 shares @ 23.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-94.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:15AM-3:20AM ET
100 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-39.99
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:15AM-2:20AM ET
80 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-32.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 22, 3:45AM-3:50AM ET
28 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-12.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 22, 12:25AM-12:30AM ET
27 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-11.82
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 22, 4:35AM-4:40AM ET
26 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-12.00
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$4.35May 20, 00:45 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:05AM-2:10AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:45AM-2:50AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:55AM-3:00AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:50AM-2:55AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:20AM-3:25AM ET$100.00May 19, 07:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:25AM-3:30AM ET$258.62May 19, 07:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:35AM-2:40AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:10AM-2:15AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:10AM-3:15AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:25AM-3:30AM ET$104.29May 19, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:05AM-2:10AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:22 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:45AM-2:50AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:22 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:55AM-3:00AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:22 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:50AM-2:55AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:22 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:35AM-2:40AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:22 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 2:10AM-2:15AM ET$0.00May 19, 07:22 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:10AM-3:15AM ET$1.3KMay 19, 07:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:20AM-3:25AM ET$15.48May 19, 07:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 19, 3:20AM-3:25AM ET$24.52May 19, 07:20 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 21
- Avg trade size
- $24.08
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 19, 07:07 UTC
- Last active
- May 20, 00:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".