Attentive-Integrity
0x2c2edee737b92570196033b3f3721e8348d9a948
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
62
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-6.7K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 62- YES
Will Real Zaragoza win on 2026-04-05?
1219 shares @ 48.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-590.72
- YES
Will Real Zaragoza win on 2026-05-01?
978 shares @ 19.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-193.10
- OVER
Al Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: O/U 4.5
707 shares @ 49.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-352.96
- NO
Will RCD Mallorca win on 2026-04-04?
640 shares @ 39.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-250.82
- YES
Will SD Huesca win on 2026-04-01?
583 shares @ 18.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-105.00
- YES
CA Tigre vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia: Both Teams to Score
495 shares @ 59.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-293.98
- NO
Will Macarthur FC win on 2026-04-02?
460 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-92.00
- NO
Will FC Tōkyō vs. FC Machida Zelvia end in a draw?
450 shares @ 32.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-146.14
- YES
Viking FK vs. Rosenborg BK: Both Teams to Score
422 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-198.00
- NO
Will Angers SCO vs. Olympique Lyonnais end in a draw?
417 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 1.5$49.15May 18, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 2.5$42.87May 18, 20:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 2.5$7.34May 18, 20:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYCD Leganés vs. SD Huesca: O/U 1.5$22.61May 18, 20:06 UTC
- REDEEMReal Zaragoza vs. Real Sporting de Gijón: O/U 3.5$122.71May 18, 20:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Zaragoza vs. Real Sporting de Gijón: O/U 3.5$42.34May 17, 21:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYMelbourne Victory FC vs. Sydney FC: Both Teams to Score$0.66May 2, 10:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYMelbourne Victory FC vs. Sydney FC: Both Teams to Score$86.67May 2, 10:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYMelbourne Victory FC vs. Sydney FC: Both Teams to Score$6.00May 2, 10:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYMelbourne Victory FC vs. Sydney FC: Both Teams to Score$0.67May 2, 10:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYMelbourne Victory FC vs. Sydney FC: Both Teams to Score$6.00May 2, 10:28 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$1.41May 2, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Zaragoza win on 2026-05-01?$92.25May 1, 20:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Zaragoza win on 2026-05-01?$4.97May 1, 20:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Zaragoza win on 2026-05-01?$6.13May 1, 20:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Zaragoza win on 2026-05-01?$91.91May 1, 20:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYGaziantep FK vs. Beşiktaş JK: Both Teams to Score$36.76May 1, 18:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYRC Deportivo La Coruña vs. CD Leganés: O/U 3.5$1.49May 1, 18:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYRC Deportivo La Coruña vs. CD Leganés: O/U 3.5$149.76May 1, 18:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYRC Deportivo La Coruña vs. CD Leganés: O/U 3.5$8.46May 1, 18:11 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $82.72
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 28, 19:30 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 20:34 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".