Well-Off-Smoking
0x2d1f81d33412efb1caaa608b72f63c5dd86effad
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
13
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-57.65
Realised
$1.10
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 13- KALMYCHATA
Dota 2: L1ga Team vs Kalmychata (BO5)
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- KALMYCHATA
Dota 2: L1ga Team vs Kalmychata - Game 3 Winner
300 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
- NO
Will Arsenal FC win on 2025-12-30?
36 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-14.00
- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down - December 30, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET
23 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-11.00
- YES
Will Al Nassr Saudi Club win on 2025-12-30?
19 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-9.00
- OVER
Al Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 4.5
15 shares @ 19.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Will Aston Villa FC win on 2025-12-30?
11 shares @ 16.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-1.75
- UNDER
Arsenal FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 2.5
11 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-5.00
- NO
Will Al Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club end in a draw?
8 shares @ 72.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-6.00
- NO
Will Damac Saudi Club win on 2025-12-30?
6 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill Al Nassr Saudi Club win on 2025-12-30?$3.63Dec 30, 21:29 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$2.43Dec 30, 21:29 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Al Ettifaq Saudi Club win on 2025-12-30?$14.65Dec 30, 21:29 UTC
- TRADESELLVermont Catamounts vs. Princeton Tigers$16.39Dec 30, 21:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Aston Villa FC win on 2025-12-30?$1.75Dec 30, 21:05 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - December 30, 1PM ET$0.00Dec 30, 20:33 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - December 30, 1PM ET$1.49Dec 30, 20:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2025-12-30?$14.00Dec 30, 20:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 2.5$5.00Dec 30, 18:44 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - December 30, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET$0.00Dec 30, 18:42 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - December 30, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET$6.40Dec 30, 18:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Damac Saudi Club win on 2025-12-30?$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club end in a draw?$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Damac Saudi Club win on 2025-12-30?$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: L1ga Team vs Kalmychata (BO5)$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 4.5$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: O/U 4.5$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Ettifaq Saudi Club win on 2025-12-30?$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Ettifaq Saudi Club win on 2025-12-30?$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club end in a draw?$1.00Dec 30, 18:26 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $2.11
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 30, 18:25 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 30, 21:29 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".