Thankful-Consistency
0x2d621bf2f23bc981cdd6a84c0a1d6738b2e17c61
Wallet digest
Activity score
47/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-199.2K
Realised
$165.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 14, 10:15AM-10:30AM ET
13099 shares @ 53.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$0.00
$-7.0K
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 8AM ET
12065 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-12.06
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 10, 4PM ET
12019 shares @ 45.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$0.00
$-5.5K
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 10, 3:00PM-3:05PM ET
9788 shares @ 44.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$0.00
$-4.3K
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 10, 2:50PM-2:55PM ET
8823 shares @ 42.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$0.00
$-3.8K
- YES
US forces enter Iran by March 31?
8042 shares @ 9.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-799.99
- YES
Netanyahu out by March 31?
7775 shares @ 3.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-299.99
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 4, 4:45AM-4:50AM ET
7720 shares @ 47.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-3.7K
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 10, 2:55PM-3:00PM ET
7552 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$0.00
$-2.9K
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 4, 5:00AM-5:05AM ET
7304 shares @ 40.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-3.0K
Recent activity
- YIELD$0.01Apr 22, 00:12 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 17, 11AM ET$0.00Apr 21, 07:54 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 17, 11AM ET$3.40Apr 21, 07:54 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 21, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$18.23Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 21, 2:30AM-2:45AM ET$18.23Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 19, 4:50PM-4:55PM ET$34.58Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 19, 6:30PM-6:45PM ET$35.81Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 19, 3:20PM-3:25PM ET$37.13Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 19, 6:05PM-6:10PM ET$91.15Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 19, 7:55AM-8:00AM ET$92.83Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 20, 6PM ET$105.92Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 18, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET$167.69Apr 21, 07:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 19, 6AM ET$182.93Apr 21, 07:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 19, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET$176.79Apr 21, 07:52 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Germany win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$568.37Apr 21, 07:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 20, 2:15PM-2:30PM ET$228.71Apr 21, 07:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 18, 4:35AM-4:40AM ET$273.44Apr 21, 07:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 19, 9:25AM-9:30AM ET$355.15Apr 21, 07:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 17, 4:35PM-4:40PM ET$364.59Apr 21, 07:51 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 16, 4:15AM-4:30AM ET$400.55Apr 21, 07:51 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 15
- Avg trade size
- $168.09
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 20, 07:21 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 22, 00:12 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".