Linear-Slime
0x2dda0116a14ad200bff7a3877a0f43e59d71fbef
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-789.72
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?
7904 shares @ 6.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 11, 2025$0.00
$-508.48
- YES
Will Nicușor Dan win the most votes in the 1st round of the Romanian presidential election?
3201 shares @ 5.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 31, 2025$0.00
$-170.00
- YES
Will George Simion win the second most votes in the first round of the Romanian Presidential Election?
1050 shares @ 10.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2025$0.00
$-111.25
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$2.08Nov 12, 18:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$3.70Nov 12, 18:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$0.36Nov 12, 18:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$15.18Nov 12, 17:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$11.39Nov 12, 17:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$9.45Nov 12, 17:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$1.10Nov 12, 17:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$23.36Nov 12, 17:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$1.04Nov 12, 17:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$0.70Nov 12, 15:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$10.40Nov 12, 07:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$0.26Nov 12, 05:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$0.26Nov 12, 05:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$5.14Nov 12, 04:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$6.20Nov 12, 04:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$5.20Nov 12, 04:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$5.47Nov 12, 04:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$1.24Nov 12, 04:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$2.95Nov 12, 04:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hollow Knight: Silksong win Game of the Year at the 2025 Game Awards?$1.09Nov 12, 02:49 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $26.11
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 10, 17:45 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 12, 18:46 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".