Chief-Navigation
0x2e0af985739857bef4b43d2edadc228d510ff92d
Wallet digest
Activity score
49/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
11
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-5.7K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 11- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 19, 6PM ET
3164 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 19, 2025$0.00
$-1.6K
- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down - October 20, 3PM ET
2341 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 20, 2025$0.00
$-1.2K
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - October 20, 5AM ET
2131 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 20, 2025$0.00
$-1.1K
- DOWN
Solana Up or Down - October 19, 9AM ET
1847 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 19, 2025$0.00
$-923.50
- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down - October 19, 9AM ET
1714 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 19, 2025$0.00
$-857.00
- MULLER
Rolex Paris Masters: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Alexandre Muller
261 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 5, 2025$0.00
$-62.64
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - January 31, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET
30 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-15.00
- DOWN
Microsoft (MSFT) Up or Down on December 16?
22 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 16, 2025$0.00
$-6.60
- UP
Google (GOOGL) Up or Down on February 4?
17 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 4, 2026$0.00
$-8.50
- UP
FTSE 100 (UKX) Up or Down on February 5?
15 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 5, 2026$0.00
$-7.50
Recent activity
- REDEEMDow Jones (DJI) Up or Down on February 6?$11.00May 5, 13:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYDow Jones (DJI) Up or Down on February 6?$5.39Feb 6, 07:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYFTSE 100 (UKX) Up or Down on February 5?$7.50Feb 5, 05:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYGoogle (GOOGL) Up or Down on February 4?$8.50Feb 4, 08:40 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - February 2, 8AM ET$19.00Feb 3, 12:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - February 2, 8AM ET$9.50Feb 2, 08:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - February 1, 9AM ET$5.00Feb 1, 08:08 UTC
- REDEEMApple (AAPL) Up or Down on December 16?$21.00Jan 31, 02:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - January 31, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET$15.00Jan 31, 02:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYApple (AAPL) Up or Down on December 16?$11.55Dec 16, 05:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYMicrosoft (MSFT) Up or Down on December 16?$6.60Dec 16, 05:24 UTC
- REDEEMRolex Paris Masters: Francisco Cerundolo vs Miomir Kecmanovic$1.2KOct 30, 06:18 UTC
- REDEEMRolex Paris Masters: Daniel Altmaier vs Casper Ruud$1.4KOct 30, 06:18 UTC
- REDEEMRolex Paris Masters: Karen Khachanov vs Joao Fonseca$1.8KOct 30, 06:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Alexandre Muller$62.64Oct 29, 04:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Francisco Cerundolo vs Miomir Kecmanovic$833.48Oct 29, 04:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Daniel Altmaier vs Casper Ruud$422.70Oct 29, 04:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Karen Khachanov vs Joao Fonseca$1.0KOct 29, 03:37 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - October 20, 5PM ET$686.00Oct 21, 02:18 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - October 20, 4PM ET$2.1KOct 21, 02:18 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 24
- Avg trade size
- $505.91
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 19, 09:47 UTC
- Last active
- May 5, 13:54 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".