Venerated-Chili
0x3041982bcccf8609518fe5ec06078c753dbb2245
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
23
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-942.65
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 23- OVER
Burnley FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 1.5
640 shares @ 81.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-522.52
- YES
Will SSC Napoli win on 2026-04-12?
230 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-101.19
- OVER
Burnley FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5
132 shares @ 83.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-109.44
- YES
Will FC Nantes win on 2026-04-11?
85 shares @ 16.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-13.65
- NEW YORK METS
Arizona Diamondbacks vs. New York Mets
69 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-4.86
- NEW YORK METS
Athletics vs. New York Mets
69 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-4.86
- OVER
Liverpool FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 2.5
57 shares @ 87.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-49.80
- OVER
Real Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5
54 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-39.68
- OVER
RC Strasbourg Alsace vs. 1. FSV Mainz 05: O/U 4.5
51 shares @ 59.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 16, 2026$0.00
$-30.57
- KANSAS CITY ROYALS
Milwaukee Brewers vs. Kansas City Royals
39 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-1.94
Recent activity
- TRADESELLElche CF vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 4.5$14.56Apr 22, 21:01 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Barcelona vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 1.5$106.92Apr 22, 20:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYBurnley FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 1.5$475.42Apr 22, 20:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Barcelona vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 1.5$100.00Apr 22, 20:04 UTC
- REDEEMElche CF vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 2.5$11.32Apr 22, 19:56 UTC
- REDEEMFC København vs. Odense BK: O/U 2.5$11.45Apr 22, 19:56 UTC
- REDEEMParis Saint-Germain FC vs. FC Nantes: O/U 1.5$55.39Apr 22, 19:56 UTC
- REDEEMFC København vs. Odense BK: O/U 1.5$13.01Apr 22, 19:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYBurnley FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$110.00Apr 22, 19:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYBurnley FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 1.5$50.00Apr 22, 19:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$40.00Apr 22, 18:52 UTC
- REDEEMLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC: O/U 4.5$60.06Apr 22, 18:48 UTC
- REDEEMLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC: O/U 2.5$60.06Apr 22, 18:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. FC Nantes: O/U 3.5$5.00Apr 22, 18:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYElche CF vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 4.5$5.00Apr 22, 18:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYElche CF vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 4.5$5.00Apr 22, 18:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. FC Nantes: O/U 3.5$5.00Apr 22, 18:10 UTC
- REDEEMQingdao Xihaian FC vs. Henan FC: O/U 4.5$20.04Apr 22, 17:39 UTC
- REDEEMQingdao Xihaian FC vs. Henan FC: O/U 2.5$50.06Apr 22, 17:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYElche CF vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 2.5$10.00Apr 22, 17:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 32
- Avg trade size
- $46.21
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 22, 02:48 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 22, 21:01 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".