Yummy-Arithmetic
0x3060a7ce185612b7c34b210f94668f2a2dfdc709
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
22
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-26.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 22- OVER
Sporting CP vs. FC Famalicão: O/U 1.5
4887 shares @ 81.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 15, 2026$0.00
$-4.0K
- OVER
Club Atlético de Madrid vs. Real Betis Balompié: O/U 1.5
4162 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-3.2K
- OVER
Real Madrid CF vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5
2894 shares @ 81.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-2.4K
- OVER
Sporting CP vs. SC União Torreense: O/U 2.5
2517 shares @ 70.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$0.00
$-1.8K
- OVER
Sunderland AFC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 1.5
2073 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-1.6K
- YES
Will Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-01-20?
1754 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- OVER
FC Utrecht vs. Feyenoord Rotterdam: O/U 1.5
1617 shares @ 77.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-1.3K
- OVER
FC Augsburg vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 1.5
1544 shares @ 77.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 15, 2026$0.00
$-1.2K
- OVER
SC Braga vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 1.5
1471 shares @ 68.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- OVER
Hellas Verona FC vs. Pisa SC: O/U 1.5
1452 shares @ 68.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 6, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSporting CP vs. SC União Torreense: O/U 2.5$785.50May 24, 17:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYSporting CP vs. SC União Torreense: O/U 2.5$1.0KMay 24, 17:52 UTC
- TRADESELLSporting CP vs. SC União Torreense: Both Teams to Score$1.8KMay 24, 17:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYSporting CP vs. SC União Torreense: Both Teams to Score$243.40May 24, 17:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSporting CP vs. SC União Torreense: Both Teams to Score$1.4KMay 24, 17:25 UTC
- TRADESELLWest Ham United FC vs. Leeds United FC: O/U 0.5$1.6KMay 24, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWest Ham United FC vs. Leeds United FC: O/U 0.5$1.2KMay 24, 16:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$2.4KMar 2, 21:31 UTC
- TRADESELLGil Vicente FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica: O/U 1.5$2.4KMar 2, 21:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYGil Vicente FC vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica: O/U 1.5$1.7KMar 2, 20:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYSporting CP vs. FC Famalicão: O/U 1.5$4.0KFeb 15, 20:07 UTC
- TRADESELLAVS Futebol vs. Estoril Praia: O/U 1.5$4.0KFeb 15, 20:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYAVS Futebol vs. Estoril Praia: O/U 1.5$3.2KFeb 15, 17:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Augsburg vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 1.5$1.2KFeb 15, 14:43 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Oviedo vs. Athletic Club: O/U 1.5$4.4KFeb 15, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Oviedo vs. Athletic Club: O/U 1.5$3.0KFeb 15, 07:48 UTC
- TRADESELLGil Vicente FC vs. SC Braga: O/U 1.5$2.1KFeb 14, 22:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYGil Vicente FC vs. SC Braga: O/U 1.5$400.00Feb 14, 21:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYGil Vicente FC vs. SC Braga: O/U 1.5$1.1KFeb 14, 21:28 UTC
- TRADESELLGil Vicente FC vs. SC Braga: O/U 1.5$254.69Feb 14, 20:58 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $1.9K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 9, 20:13 UTC
- Last active
- May 24, 17:52 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".