Worthwhile-Assurance
0x33a78dd70181ad5c804ec80e46d0935cca74960d
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-523.3K
Realised
$-642.04
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- OVER
CA Vélez Sarsfield vs. CA Boca Juniors: O/U 3.5
63747 shares @ 14.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 9, 2026$0.00
$-9.5K
- OVER
Brentford FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 3.5
44964 shares @ 22.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-10.0K
- OVER
CR Vasco da Gama vs. EC Bahia: O/U 3.5
37279 shares @ 24.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-9.1K
- OVER
EC Bahia vs. Fluminense FC: O/U 2.5
36004 shares @ 47.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 5, 2026$0.00
$-17.0K
- OVER
Brentford FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5
35892 shares @ 27.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-10.0K
- OVER
Al Hazem SC vs. Al Okhdood SC: O/U 3.5
35883 shares @ 32.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-11.5K
- OVER
West Ham United FC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 2.5
35379 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-10.6K
- OVER
Sunderland AFC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 3.5
32301 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-9.7K
- OVER
Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. FC Alverca: O/U 3.5
32113 shares @ 47.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-15.4K
- YES
Will Birmingham City FC win on 2026-02-10?
30843 shares @ 12.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-3.7K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWestern Sydney Wanderers FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 2.5$19.30Apr 11, 10:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWestern Sydney Wanderers FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 2.5$38.00Apr 11, 10:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWestern Sydney Wanderers FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 2.5$14.50Apr 11, 10:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWestern Sydney Wanderers FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 2.5$15.00Apr 11, 10:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWestern Sydney Wanderers FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 2.5$10.20Apr 11, 10:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWestern Sydney Wanderers FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 2.5$15.00Apr 11, 10:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. AEK: Both Teams to Score$22.41Apr 9, 18:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Oviedo (-1.5)$0.22Apr 5, 18:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Oviedo (-1.5)$78.40Apr 5, 18:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Oviedo (-1.5)$31.58Apr 5, 18:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYSevilla FC vs. Valencia CF: Both Teams to Score$96.80Mar 21, 21:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYSevilla FC vs. Valencia CF: Both Teams to Score$3.20Mar 21, 21:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire FC: O/U 3.5$591.36Mar 21, 21:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire FC: O/U 3.5$1.32Mar 21, 21:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire FC: O/U 3.5$0.67Mar 21, 21:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire FC: O/U 3.5$5.60Mar 21, 21:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire FC: O/U 3.5$1.32Mar 21, 21:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire FC: O/U 3.5$5.60Mar 21, 21:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire FC: O/U 3.5$23.33Mar 21, 21:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYPhiladelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire FC: O/U 3.5$100.00Mar 21, 21:55 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $84.39
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 17, 21:06 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 11, 10:51 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".