Ill-Fated-Decoder
0x355131de2f199a22fd1f257ecf33b1e45dfe7311
Wallet digest
Activity score
30/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
57
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-116.12
Realised
$-0.21
Win rate
0%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 57- YES
Will CR Flamengo vs. Estudiantes de La Plata end in a draw?
27 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-6.40
- NO
FC Internazionale Milano vs. FK Bodø/Glimt: Both Teams to Score
25 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-10.91
- UNDER
Qarabağ Ağdam FK vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5
23 shares @ 8.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 18, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- UNDER
Celtic FC vs. VfB Stuttgart: O/U 2.5
21 shares @ 18.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- UNDER
Celtic FC vs. VfB Stuttgart: O/U 1.5
19 shares @ 10.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- OVER
Deportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 4.5
14 shares @ 13.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 23, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- UNDER
Al Shabab Saudi Club vs. Al Ahli Saudi Club: O/U 1.5
14 shares @ 13.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 13, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- OVER
Al Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club: O/U 4.5
14 shares @ 34.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 13, 2026$0.00
$-4.70
- OVER
Burton Albion FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 2.5
13 shares @ 15.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- UNDER
Deportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 1.5
12 shares @ 17.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 23, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill CR Flamengo win on 2026-05-20?$25.97May 21, 03:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CR Flamengo win on 2026-05-20?$16.90May 20, 23:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CR Flamengo vs. Estudiantes de La Plata end in a draw?$6.55May 20, 21:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Internazionale Milano vs. FK Bodø/Glimt: Both Teams to Score$10.91Feb 23, 22:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 4.5$1.00Feb 23, 21:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 4.5$1.00Feb 23, 21:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 3.5$0.54Feb 23, 21:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 3.5$4.86Feb 23, 21:34 UTC
- TRADESELLDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 2.5$0.67Feb 23, 20:48 UTC
- TRADESELLBologna FC 1909 vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 1.5$1.86Feb 23, 20:44 UTC
- TRADESELLEverton FC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 1.5$2.30Feb 23, 20:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 2.5$1.00Feb 23, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 1.5$1.00Feb 23, 20:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 2.5$1.00Feb 23, 20:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Girona FC: O/U 1.5$1.00Feb 23, 19:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 1.5$1.00Feb 23, 19:34 UTC
- TRADESELLACF Fiorentina vs. Pisa SC: O/U 1.5$0.17Feb 23, 18:41 UTC
- TRADESELLACF Fiorentina vs. Pisa SC: O/U 1.5$1.03Feb 23, 18:40 UTC
- TRADESELLACF Fiorentina vs. Pisa SC: O/U 2.5$1.46Feb 23, 18:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. Pisa SC: O/U 2.5$1.00Feb 23, 17:59 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $2.86
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 21, 21:25 UTC
- Last active
- May 21, 03:44 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".