Lively-Elver
0x365a7814a8ea4c5a98a1f226fbacf352a08078a8
Wallet digest
Activity score
48/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
9
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-231.07
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?
75000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-75.00
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be between $106K and $108K on September 8?
1295 shares @ 10.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 8, 2025$0.00
$-140.55
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $80,000 in November?
100 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 1, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $84,000 December 15-21?
85 shares @ 4.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 22, 2025$0.00
$-4.00
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be less than $104K on September 10?
31 shares @ 5.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 10, 2025$0.00
$-1.75
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $84,000 November 24-30?
23 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 1, 2025$0.00
$-1.62
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $85,000 in February?
11 shares @ 13.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-1.40
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $70,000 on February 10?
10 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down on December 20?
8 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-1.75
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in February?$1.40Feb 6, 10:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?$3.00Feb 6, 00:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?$72.00Feb 6, 00:22 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?$75.27Feb 6, 00:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $70,000 on February 10?$3.00Feb 5, 18:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?$45.00Feb 5, 18:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down on December 20?$1.75Dec 20, 10:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $84,000 December 15-21?$4.00Dec 20, 09:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $84,000 November 24-30?$1.62Nov 27, 13:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $80,000 in November?$2.00Nov 27, 13:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be less than $104K on September 10?$1.75Sep 5, 22:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $106K and $108K on September 8?$22.00Sep 5, 14:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $106K and $108K on September 8?$20.82Sep 5, 09:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $106K and $108K on September 8?$97.73Sep 4, 03:33 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be between $107K and $109K on July 11?$0.00Jul 11, 21:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $107K and $109K on July 11?$13.04Jul 9, 17:27 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be between $107K and $109K on July 9?$0.28Jul 9, 14:47 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be between $107K and $109K on July 9?$13.77Jul 9, 14:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $107K and $109K on July 9?$8.50Jul 9, 01:04 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 18
- Avg trade size
- $21.50
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 9, 01:04 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 6, 10:41 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".