Gregarious-Robe
0x36a0f1d31b1201f928081a2f2f7ec191a7215f52
Wallet digest
Activity score
30/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
22
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.1K
Realised
$-68.84
Win rate
0%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 22- YES
Will Bilibili Gaming win the 2025 Mid-Season Invitational?
10766 shares @ 2.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 12, 2025$0.00
$-259.48
- YES
Will Movistar KOI win the 2025 Mid-Season Invitational?
5000 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 12, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will CTBC Flying Oyster win the 2025 Mid-Season Invitational?
3843 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 12, 2025$0.00
$-9.93
- YES
Will FlyQuest win the 2025 Mid-Season Invitational?
3239 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 12, 2025$0.00
$-25.91
- FLYQUEST
MSI Playoffs: Bilibili Gaming vs. FlyQuest
1612 shares @ 7.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 9, 2025$0.00
$-124.23
- GAM
MSI Play-in: GAM vs. Bilibili Gaming
800 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 29, 2025$0.00
$-23.99
- G2
MSI Playoffs: Gen.G vs. G2
703 shares @ 3.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 2, 2025$0.00
$-22.89
- CTBC
MSI Playoffs: CTBC Flying Oyster vs. Anyone's Legend
620 shares @ 22.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 9, 2025$0.00
$-137.60
- FLYING OYSTER
MSI Playoffs: T1 vs. Flying Oyster
587 shares @ 22.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 5, 2025$0.00
$-130.00
- AG.AL
League of Legends: AG.AL vs. Gen.G
544 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 21, 2025$0.00
$-233.92
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: DRX vs. OKSavingsBank BRION$86.40Aug 31, 10:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Cloud9 vs. Disguised$8.05Aug 29, 23:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Cloud9 vs. Disguised$20.00Aug 29, 23:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Cloud9 vs. Disguised$1.15Aug 29, 23:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Cloud9 vs. Disguised$32.75Aug 29, 23:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Cloud9 vs. Disguised$33.90Aug 29, 23:09 UTC
- TRADESELLLeague of Legends: BNK FEARX vs. DRX$87.30Aug 29, 10:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: BNK FEARX vs. DRX$10.08Aug 29, 09:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: BNK FEARX vs. DRX$46.62Aug 29, 09:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Nongshim Red Force vs. T1$28.98Aug 22, 09:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Nongshim Red Force vs. T1$21.00Aug 22, 09:44 UTC
- TRADESELLLeague of Legends: Nongshim Red Force vs. T1$13.90Aug 22, 09:08 UTC
- TRADESELLLeague of Legends: Nongshim Red Force vs. T1$5.00Aug 22, 09:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Nongshim Red Force vs. T1$25.20Aug 22, 07:18 UTC
- REDEEMLeague of Legends: Anyone's Legend vs. Top Esports$230.00Aug 19, 21:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Anyone's Legend vs. Top Esports$44.72Aug 19, 05:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Anyone's Legend vs. Top Esports$54.18Aug 19, 02:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Anyone's Legend vs. Team WE$14.00Jul 30, 06:41 UTC
- REDEEMLeague of Legends: T1 vs. Gen.G$149.89Jul 25, 21:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: T1 vs. Gen.G$50.96Jul 25, 10:00 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $61.86
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 13, 07:08 UTC
- Last active
- Aug 31, 10:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".