Known-Mandarin
0x3752d5f496e63b3498f589b1164947805e106d83
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
29
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-40.96
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 29- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down on October 28?
1004 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 28, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $116,000 on October 28?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 28, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 3, 11AM ET
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 3, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be between $110,000 and $112,000 on October 29?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 29, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 27, 11PM ET
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 28, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down on January 29?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Gold (GC) hit (HIGH) $6,000 by end of January?
111 shares @ 0.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Trump pardon Diddy by Friday?
85 shares @ 1.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 24, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 24, 9AM ET
50 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 24, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be between $118,000 and $120,000 on October 28?
37 shares @ 2.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 28, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 23, 5:30PM-5:35PM ET$1.00Feb 23, 22:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 3, 11:30AM-11:45AM ET$0.00Feb 3, 16:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 3, 11AM ET$1.00Feb 3, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 3, 11:45AM-12:00PM ET$2.00Feb 3, 16:49 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 3, 11:30AM-11:45AM ET$1.73Feb 3, 16:48 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - January 29, 3PM ET$1.96Feb 3, 16:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 3, 11:30AM-11:45AM ET$1.00Feb 3, 16:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 29, 3PM ET$1.00Jan 29, 18:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down on January 29?$1.00Jan 29, 18:02 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - January 14, 11PM ET$1.96Jan 29, 17:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 14, 10PM ET$1.00Jan 14, 23:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 14, 11PM ET$1.00Jan 14, 23:15 UTC
- TRADESELLWill 1 Fed rate cut happen in 2026?$0.89Jan 14, 00:02 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin hit $80k or $150k first?$1.09Jan 14, 00:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin hit $80k or $150k first?$1.00Jan 7, 01:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Gold (GC) hit (HIGH) $6,000 by end of January?$1.00Jan 4, 00:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 1 Fed rate cut happen in 2026?$1.00Jan 4, 00:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down on January 4?$1.00Jan 4, 00:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYFed decreases interest rates by 25 bps after January 2026 meeting?$1.00Jan 4, 00:37 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down on December 24?$1.47Jan 4, 00:35 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $1.33
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 29, 17:09 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 23, 22:32 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".