Female-Height
0x392a8d31247ef19fde34e2d2314ac2cca09c9a1e
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Elon tweet 850-899 times Feb 21-28?$0.00Mar 1, 20:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 850-899 times Feb 21-28?$0.76Feb 26, 01:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 850-899 times Feb 21-28?$1.32Feb 26, 00:10 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon tweet less than 400 times Feb 21-28?$0.00Feb 25, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet less than 400 times Feb 21-28?$3.00Feb 24, 15:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Kanye name his token Portnoy?$2.00Feb 23, 18:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump cut Ukraine off from Starlink?$1.00Feb 23, 18:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet less than 400 times Feb 21-28?$0.20Feb 23, 18:12 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $1.38
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 23, 18:12 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 1, 20:03 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".