Forsaken-Discharge
0x3a8638c8847ef6e365b9bb3567a82823649d58a3
Wallet digest
Activity score
42/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-33.03
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Trump say "Ford" during Michigan rally on October 18?$0.00Oct 26, 21:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump say "trans" during Pennsylvania rally on October 26?$33.03Oct 26, 21:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump say "Ford" during Michigan rally on October 18?$32.00Oct 17, 17:32 UTC
- REDEEMWho will win the VP debate according to polls?$0.00Oct 9, 11:50 UTC
- REDEEMWho will win the VP debate according to polls?$65.03Oct 9, 11:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWho will win the VP debate according to polls?$43.57Oct 3, 03:10 UTC
- REDEEMWill Trump say "Marxist" at debate?$43.58Sep 11, 03:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump say "Marxist" at debate?$28.76Sep 9, 23:52 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $34.34
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Sep 9, 23:52 UTC
- Last active
- Oct 26, 21:40 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".