Unrealistic-Acceptance
0x3aee07247d39221097306b30334cb3d760f419d5
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-19.40
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSichuan Blue Whales vs. Jilin Northeast Tigers$0.76Jan 17, 08:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYSichuan Blue Whales vs. Jilin Northeast Tigers$10.08Jan 17, 08:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYSichuan Blue Whales vs. Jilin Northeast Tigers$3.55Jan 17, 08:09 UTC
- TRADESELLBeijing Ducks vs. Shanxi Loongs$30.32Jan 16, 16:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanxi Loongs$0.11Jan 16, 12:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanxi Loongs$3.20Jan 16, 12:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanxi Loongs$8.60Jan 16, 12:41 UTC
- REDEEMTrail Blazers vs. Warriors$21.51Jan 15, 12:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $4,600 in January?$5.00Jan 14, 04:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYTrail Blazers vs. Warriors$20.00Jan 14, 04:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $9.07
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 14, 04:41 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 17, 08:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".