Famous-Intentionality
0x3cd6c96f78816f0ac05829e680443a961281b378
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-5.9K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- YES
Will FC Bayern München win on 2025-12-14?
1208 shares @ 82.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 14, 2025$0.00
$-1000.00
- OVER
Udinese Calcio vs. US Cremonese: O/U 2.5
1200 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-396.00
- YES
Will Manchester United FC win on 2025-12-30?
620 shares @ 71.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-440.00
- YES
Levante UD vs. RCD Mallorca: Both Teams to Score
600 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-270.00
- YES
Will FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-05-17?
500 shares @ 66.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-329.98
- YES
Will Tunisia win on 2025-12-30?
301 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-192.52
- YES
Will Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?
300 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-99.00
- AVALANCHE
Avalanche vs. Predators
190 shares @ 67.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-128.57
- YES
Will Manchester United FC win on 2026-03-04?
175 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-70.00
- KINGS
Blue Jackets vs. Kings
167 shares @ 59.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 23, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$4.51May 18, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYUdinese Calcio vs. US Cremonese: O/U 2.5$387.75May 17, 19:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYUdinese Calcio vs. US Cremonese: O/U 2.5$1.65May 17, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYUdinese Calcio vs. US Cremonese: O/U 2.5$1.65May 17, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYUdinese Calcio vs. US Cremonese: O/U 2.5$1.65May 17, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYUdinese Calcio vs. US Cremonese: O/U 2.5$1.65May 17, 19:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYUdinese Calcio vs. US Cremonese: O/U 2.5$1.65May 17, 19:55 UTC
- REDEEMMirassol FC vs. Associação Chapecoense de Futebol: O/U 1.5$50.00May 17, 19:45 UTC
- REDEEMGetafe CF vs. RCD Mallorca: Both Teams to Score$50.00May 17, 19:45 UTC
- REDEEMFluminense FC vs. São Paulo FC: Both Teams to Score$50.00May 17, 19:45 UTC
- REDEEMFC St. Pauli 1910 vs. VfL Wolfsburg: Both Teams to Score$96.23May 17, 19:45 UTC
- REDEEMWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-10?$100.00May 17, 19:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYLevante UD vs. RCD Mallorca: Both Teams to Score$0.45May 17, 17:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYLevante UD vs. RCD Mallorca: Both Teams to Score$103.50May 17, 17:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYLevante UD vs. RCD Mallorca: Both Teams to Score$155.70May 17, 17:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYLevante UD vs. RCD Mallorca: Both Teams to Score$4.05May 17, 17:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYLevante UD vs. RCD Mallorca: Both Teams to Score$4.05May 17, 17:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYLevante UD vs. RCD Mallorca: Both Teams to Score$2.25May 17, 17:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$9.23May 17, 15:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$82.50May 17, 15:30 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 38
- Avg trade size
- $31.23
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 15, 00:22 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 00:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".