Back-Caribou
0x3f2c3c4d9bd3ae2b917854abe7d3daf38600301a
Wallet digest
Activity score
41/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.6K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Bitcoin above $106K on August 29?
3550 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 29, 2025$0.00
$-71.00
- UP
XRP Up or Down on August 28?
3500 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 28, 2025$0.00
$-1.5K
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be between $110K and $111K on August 28 at 4PM ET?
3500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 28, 2025$0.00
$-35.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $106K on August 29?$71.00Aug 29, 12:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $110K and $111K on August 28 at 4PM ET?$35.00Aug 28, 18:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down on August 28?$1.5KAug 27, 19:29 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $548.67
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Aug 27, 19:29 UTC
- Last active
- Aug 29, 12:27 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".