Political-Roar
0x40d5ad6b37a758520043085e88f11272ebe4df1f
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-56.88
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down on July 22?$27.48Jul 22, 05:30 UTC
- REDEEMWhite Sox vs. Rays$33.83Jul 22, 05:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWhite Sox vs. Rays$11.84Jul 21, 01:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $117K and $118K on July 19 at 5PM ET?$29.40Jul 19, 09:54 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Brad Lander win the 2025 NYC mayoral election?$861.24Jul 18, 18:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brad Lander win the 2025 NYC mayoral election?$862.11Jul 18, 18:10 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $60K in July?$809.19Jul 18, 18:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60K in July?$810.00Jul 18, 18:01 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $487.32
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 18, 18:01 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 22, 05:30 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".