Misty-Inglenook
0x4473001b2e68f221f4655909899d0981bcd614ba
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-529.80
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 10:10PM-10:15PM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 9:45PM-9:50PM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 1:40AM-1:45AM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 11:45PM-11:50PM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 2:15AM-2:20AM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 1:05AM-1:10AM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:45AM-12:50AM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:55AM-1:00AM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:20AM-12:25AM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 11:10PM-11:15PM ET
330 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.30
Recent activity
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:15AM-12:20AM ET$0.00Apr 22, 20:00 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:25AM-12:30AM ET$0.00Apr 22, 20:00 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:00AM-12:05AM ET$0.00Apr 22, 20:00 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 10:15PM-10:20PM ET$0.00Apr 22, 19:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 1:15AM-1:20AM ET$0.00Apr 22, 19:53 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 1:30AM-1:35AM ET$0.00Apr 22, 19:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 11:05PM-11:10PM ET$0.00Apr 22, 19:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 8:35PM-8:40PM ET$0.00Apr 22, 19:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 9:00PM-9:05PM ET$0.00Apr 22, 19:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 30, 10:15AM-10:30AM ET$0.00Apr 22, 19:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 22, 2:25PM-2:30PM ET$0.05Apr 22, 18:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 21, 3PM ET$21.59Apr 21, 19:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 21, 3PM ET$8.89Apr 21, 19:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 21, 3PM ET$27.67Apr 21, 19:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 21, 2PM ET$3.57Apr 21, 18:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 21, 2PM ET$5.82Apr 21, 18:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 21, 2PM ET$6.23Apr 21, 18:55 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in April?$5.77Apr 21, 16:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in April?$5.79Apr 21, 16:49 UTC
- TRADESELLEthereum Up or Down - April 21, 6AM ET$4.80Apr 21, 14:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 38
- Avg trade size
- $9.46
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 21, 06:32 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 22, 20:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".