Functional-Satellite
0x4640a3e4546d2c99593a207baa324d044b3e7137
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$0.01
Total PnL
$-139.63
Realised
$10.97
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will SpaceX's public ticker be $SEX?
26 shares @ 5.4¢·now 0.1¢·exp Dec 31, 2027$0.01
$-1.39
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $112,000 on September 30?
95 shares @ 10.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 30, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 220-239 tweets from November 7 to November 14, 2025?
79 shares @ 94.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 14, 2025$0.00
$-75.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - September 27, 2:00PM-2:15PM ET
53 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 27, 2025$0.00
$-8.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - September 27, 2PM ET
51 shares @ 20.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 27, 2025$0.00
$-10.38
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - September 27, 5:45PM-6:00PM ET
44 shares @ 37.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 27, 2025$0.00
$-16.20
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $112,000 on October 1?
39 shares @ 19.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 1, 2025$0.00
$-7.50
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $96,000 on November 16?
22 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 16, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - September 27, 3:00PM-3:15PM ET
21 shares @ 34.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 27, 2025$0.00
$-7.14
- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down - September 28, 3:45PM-4:00PM ET
13 shares @ 37.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 28, 2025$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - September 27, 2:30PM-2:45PM ET$0.00Apr 26, 21:20 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in April?$11.45Apr 15, 21:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in April?$10.00Apr 10, 01:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in April?$10.00Apr 9, 10:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in April?$11.33Apr 7, 22:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in April?$16.83Apr 5, 23:18 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$23.76Mar 16, 23:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$15.60Mar 16, 09:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$12.75Mar 11, 17:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$3.95Mar 11, 13:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$16.12Mar 10, 20:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 in February?$3.64Feb 12, 13:18 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $75,000 in February?$4.18Feb 12, 13:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $75,000 in February?$3.63Feb 11, 23:01 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $75,000 in February?$1.94Feb 11, 21:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 in February?$1.30Feb 11, 03:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 in February?$0.19Feb 11, 03:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 in February?$1.60Feb 11, 00:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 in February?$1.02Feb 10, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $75,000 in February?$2.14Feb 10, 14:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $10.14
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 13, 16:32 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 26, 21:20 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".