Profitable-Peertopeer
0x46ec1d8ffcb80f0dd16a7fdb2ed7724fbb473db5
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
22
Open notional
$410.17
Total PnL
$-3.1K
Realised
$-4.70
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 22- CONNECTICUT HUSKIES
Spread: Michigan Wolverines (-6.5)
410 shares @ 48.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 7, 2026$410.17
$213.29
- YES
Will the Los Angeles Chargers win Super Bowl 2026?
6318 shares @ 3.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-221.04
- YES
Will Kentucky win the 2026 NCAA Tournament?
5000 shares @ 3.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-175.00
- ARIZONA WILDCATS
Arizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines
4730 shares @ 20.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-984.94
- YES
Will the Steelers win the AFC Championship?
4308 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-302.48
- YES
Will the Chargers win the AFC Championship?
1476 shares @ 6.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- KENNESAW STATE OWLS
Kennesaw State Owls vs. Gonzaga Bulldogs
1427 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$0.00
$-99.88
- CONNECTICUT HUSKIES
Connecticut Huskies vs. Michigan Wolverines
640 shares @ 21.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 7, 2026$0.00
$-136.70
- 49ERS
49ers vs. Seahawks
500 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-140.00
- OVER
Illinois Fighting Illini vs. Iowa Hawkeyes: O/U 138.5
500 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 28, 2026$0.00
$-244.91
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYConnecticut Huskies vs. Michigan Wolverines$20.00Apr 7, 02:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYConnecticut Huskies vs. Michigan Wolverines$20.00Apr 7, 02:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYConnecticut Huskies vs. Michigan Wolverines$100.00Apr 7, 01:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Michigan Wolverines (-6.5)$200.00Apr 7, 01:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$100.00Apr 5, 02:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$100.00Apr 5, 02:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$100.00Apr 5, 02:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$11.17Apr 5, 02:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$48.83Apr 5, 02:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$100.00Apr 5, 02:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$100.00Apr 5, 02:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$100.00Apr 5, 02:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$20.00Apr 5, 01:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$10.00Apr 5, 01:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$2.60Apr 5, 01:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$3.33Apr 5, 01:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$5.12Apr 5, 01:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$13.37Apr 5, 01:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$0.33Apr 5, 01:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYArizona Wildcats vs. Michigan Wolverines$75.24Apr 5, 01:44 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $77.96
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 27, 01:03 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 7, 02:19 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".