Regal-Wiseguy
0x48fdc1ec132f19b158c506e893746c87f45f45e6
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
17
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 17- DVALISHVILI
UFC 323: Dvalishvili vs. Yan (Bantamweight, Main Card)
241 shares @ 79.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-190.00
- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-01-01?
152 shares @ 66.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- DELLA MADDALENA
UFC 322: Makhachev vs. Della Maddalena (Welterweight, Main Card)
148 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 16, 2025$0.00
$-40.00
- YES
Will Real Madrid win on 2025-11-09?
146 shares @ 68.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Manchester United FC win on 2025-12-30?
137 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Fulham win on 2025-12-07?
132 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-50.00
- EUBANK JR.
Chris Eubank Jr. vs Conor Benn Nov 15, 2025
105 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 15, 2025$0.00
$-60.00
- YES
Will CA Talleres win on 2025-11-23?
100 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 23, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will Chelsea win on 2025-12-03?
89 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 3, 2025$0.00
$-50.00
- YES
Will Manchester United FC win on 2026-01-07?
86 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-01-08?$8.97Jan 8, 03:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-01-07?$50.00Jan 7, 13:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-01-08?$40.00Jan 7, 13:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-01-07?$50.00Jan 7, 13:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. Leeds United FC: Both Teams to Score$30.00Jan 1, 16:50 UTC
- REDEEMArsenal FC vs. Aston Villa FC: Both Teams to Score$79.45Jan 1, 16:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-01-01?$100.00Dec 27, 21:19 UTC
- REDEEMWill Arsenal FC win on 2025-12-27?$136.99Dec 27, 21:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Aston Villa FC: Both Teams to Score$40.00Dec 27, 21:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2025-12-30?$100.00Dec 27, 21:11 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Manchester City FC win on 2025-12-27?$64.44Dec 27, 14:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2025-12-27?$100.00Dec 27, 13:59 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Manchester United FC win on 2025-12-26?$131.44Dec 26, 22:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2025-12-26?$50.00Dec 26, 19:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2025-12-27?$140.00Dec 25, 17:00 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Aston Villa FC win on 2025-12-21?$135.53Dec 21, 18:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Aston Villa FC win on 2025-12-21?$70.00Dec 20, 22:43 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Arsenal FC win on 2025-12-20?$199.80Dec 20, 22:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2025-12-20?$124.00Dec 20, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester City FC win on 2025-12-14?$94.34Dec 16, 07:24 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $77.32
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 29, 21:52 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 8, 03:26 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".