Arid-Boon
0x49163ccb344e925aed3db257cacf2c72b0895442
Wallet digest
Activity score
62/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
10
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-20.2K
Realised
$-614.66
Win rate
80%
5 closed
Largest open positions
- TEAM VITALITY
LoL: Shifters vs Team Vitality - Game 1 Winner
21000 shares @ 40.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-8.5K
- ANYONES LEGEND
LoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 3 Winner
15968 shares @ 48.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-7.7K
- SK GAMING
LoL: SK Gaming vs Galions - Game 2 Winner
8770 shares @ 18.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-1.6K
- SK GAMING
LoL: SK Gaming vs Galions - Game 1 Winner
3500 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-70.00
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs GamerLegion - Map 2 Winner
1689 shares @ 18.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-314.00
- INTZ E-SPORTS
LoL: paiN Gaming Academy vs INTZ e-Sports - Game 1 Winner
1361 shares @ 69.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-938.95
- LOUD
LoL: FURIA Esports vs LOUD - Game 3 Winner
500 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-180.00
- HANWHA LIFE ESPORTS
LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs Dplus KIA (BO3) - Esports World Cup Korea Qualifier Playoffs
415 shares @ 14.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-59.93
- HANWHA LIFE ESPORTS
LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs Dplus KIA - Game 2 Winner
318 shares @ 42.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-135.99
- OZAROX ESPORTS
LoL: Misa Esports vs Ozarox Esports - Game 1 Winner
193 shares @ 59.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-114.31
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$31.90May 23, 00:45 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$18.3KMay 22, 19:42 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming - Game 4 Winner$10.8KMay 22, 19:41 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming - Game 3 Winner$26.3KMay 22, 19:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$970.00May 22, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$32.33May 22, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$32.33May 22, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$42.03May 22, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$88.00May 22, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$112.31May 22, 13:07 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$930.68May 22, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$3.8KMay 22, 13:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$1.9KMay 22, 13:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$5.1KMay 22, 12:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$20.16May 22, 12:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$12.78May 22, 12:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$20.13May 22, 12:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$42.59May 22, 12:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$840.07May 22, 12:47 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: JD Gaming vs Weibo Gaming (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2$44.06May 22, 12:46 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentLedger volume
$34.6K
Trades
1
Buy share
16%
Window
May 17, 17:40 UTC → May 21, 11:08 UTC
- BUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$5.7K@99¢May 21, 09:22 UTC
Wallet edge sanity
Needs review
25/100Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
80% win rate over 5 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
0/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
46 live trades, 3 ledger trades, copy-risk 60/100.
5 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
16%
Sample
limited
3 ledger trades
Top market concentration
LoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner
$26.0K · 75% of recorded whale volume
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $319.10
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 22, 12:46 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 00:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 5 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.