New-Return
0x4a00c3b1d84eb879eb24f811c676910a7a999e8b
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.9K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYNets vs. Kings: O/U 219.5$19.76Mar 22, 15:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $4,400 in February?$5.00Mar 22, 04:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $5,000 in February?$10.00Mar 22, 04:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $4,400 in February?$4.99Feb 7, 05:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $5,000 in February?$9.98Feb 7, 05:22 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $150,000 in January?$3.37Feb 7, 05:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $150,000 in January?$3.36Jan 27, 03:22 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Spurs (-6.5)$3.0KJan 18, 07:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Spurs (-6.5)$1.5KJan 17, 12:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Celtics (-3.5)$1.6KJan 17, 12:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Pistons (-13.5)$1.3KJan 17, 12:19 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $638.89
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 17, 12:19 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 22, 15:02 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".