Piercing-Bower
0x4a752b35b076ccefcf1f43412d69941db7b2e444
Wallet digest
Activity score
62/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
11
Open notional
$14.00
Total PnL
$-798.59
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 11- YES
Exact Score: Arsenal FC 2 - 0 Burnley FC?
100 shares @ 14.0¢·now 14.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$14.00
$0.00
- NONGSHIM RED FORCE
LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs Nongshim Red Force (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2
770 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-223.30
- TEAM WE
LoL: Weibo Gaming vs Team WE - Game 1 Winner
425 shares @ 24.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-103.19
- HANWHA LIFE ESPORTS
LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs KT Rolster - Game 1 Winner
265 shares @ 60.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-159.78
- NONGSHIM RED FORCE
LoL: Nongshim Red Force vs Gen.G - Game 1 Winner
224 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-44.80
- BNK FEARX
LoL: T1 vs BNK FEARX - Game 1 Winner
200 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-62.00
- EDWARD GAMING
LoL: LGD Gaming vs EDward Gaming - Game 1 Winner
200 shares @ 35.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 23, 2026$0.00
$-71.00
- ANYONES LEGEND
LoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner
157 shares @ 42.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-67.35
- BNK FEARX
LoL: T1 vs BNK FEARX - Game 2 Winner
64 shares @ 78.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-50.49
- UNDER
JEF United Ichihara Chiba vs. Kashima Antlers: O/U 1.5
24 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-13.25
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Arsenal FC 2 - 0 Burnley FC?$14.00May 18, 05:11 UTC
- TRADESELLCavaliers vs. Pistons: O/U 210.5$4.00May 18, 02:09 UTC
- TRADESELLCavaliers vs. Pistons: O/U 207.5$0.44May 18, 02:09 UTC
- TRADESELLCavaliers vs. Pistons: O/U 207.5$0.26May 18, 02:08 UTC
- TRADESELLCavaliers vs. Pistons: O/U 207.5$5.00May 18, 02:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Pistons: O/U 210.5$46.00May 18, 01:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Pistons: O/U 207.5$52.00May 18, 01:15 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$3.95May 18, 00:45 UTC
- REDEEMWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.00May 18, 00:23 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$148.49May 17, 19:52 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: FC Internazionale Milano (-1.5)$216.00May 17, 17:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$6.74May 17, 16:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$30.46May 17, 16:49 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$39.96May 17, 16:38 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Brentford FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.22May 17, 15:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brentford FC win on 2026-05-17?$1.53May 17, 14:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$83.42May 17, 14:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$12.04May 17, 14:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$6.48May 17, 14:07 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Kiwoom DRX vs HANJIN BRION (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$103.47May 17, 13:43 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $22.80
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 10:21 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 05:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".