Academic-Chart
0x4abb112c0e1ed59150e5c585d5ce016b86d934c9
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-195.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill "Zootopia 2" score at least 85 on the Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer?$5.06Dec 26, 10:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Team Shadowkek vs Team CS2NEWS (BO3)$195.00Dec 23, 13:40 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Microsoft reach $668 in November?$18.65Nov 10, 07:23 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Microsoft reach $668 in November?$18.52Nov 10, 07:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "Zootopia 2" score at least 85 on the Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer?$4.20Nov 10, 06:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Microsoft reach $668 in November?$15.61Nov 10, 06:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Microsoft reach $668 in November?$13.30Nov 10, 06:29 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $44.21
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 10, 06:29 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 26, 10:22 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".