Inconsequential-Monopoly
0x4bc1dc9f59949ea9148c07da10520bd400697383
Activity score
78/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$24.96
Total PnL
$0.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill TSV Fortuna 95 Düsseldorf win on 2026-05-02?$25.081d ago
- REDEEMWill Middlesbrough FC vs. Sheffield Wednesday FC end in a draw?$33.149d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Middlesbrough FC vs. Sheffield Wednesday FC end in a draw?$29.9210d ago
- REDEEMWill FK Dinamo Makhachkala win on 2026-04-19?$14.0011d ago
- REDEEMRaptors vs. Cavaliers$23.5813d ago
- TRADEBUYWill FK Dinamo Makhachkala win on 2026-04-19?$12.5414d ago
- TRADEBUYRaptors vs. Cavaliers$18.2815d ago
- REDEEMWill FC Metz win on 2026-04-10?$19.8616d ago
- TRADEBUYWill FC Metz win on 2026-04-10?$18.5123d ago
- REWARD$0.7826d ago
- REWARD$0.2526d ago
- REDEEMWill Gambia win on 2026-03-31?$18.1631d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Gambia win on 2026-03-31?$17.8532d ago
- REDEEMNets vs. Trail Blazers$11.5634d ago
- REDEEMPacers vs. Spurs$16.7640d ago
- REDEEMWill Gwangju FC win on 2026-03-22?$18.2440d ago
- REDEEMTexas A&M Aggies vs. Houston Cougars$0.0041d ago
- TRADEBUYTexas A&M Aggies vs. Houston Cougars$1.8541d ago
- TRADEBUYNets vs. Trail Blazers$10.1741d ago
- TRADEBUYPacers vs. Spurs$15.7541d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 24
- Avg trade size
- $14.60
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 59d ago
- Last active
- 1d ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".