Fatal-Proposal
0x4c15130b0595241e7bf3a3347eafce84c192cc6b
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
26
Open notional
$722.14
Total PnL
$-2.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 26- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in June?
1010 shares @ 9.0¢·now 71.5¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$722.14
$631.24
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $64,000 on March 29?
3499 shares @ 8.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2026$0.00
$-308.92
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $72,000 on March 11?
1700 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 11, 2026$0.00
$-153.00
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $62,000 on March 29?
1700 shares @ 5.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2026$0.00
$-95.98
- YES
Will the price of Ethereum be above $3,200 on January 4?
1671 shares @ 5.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-86.50
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $70,000 on February 21?
1622 shares @ 3.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-63.07
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $70,000 on February 22?
1357 shares @ 13.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$0.00
$-185.99
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $72,000 on March 9?
1300 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 9, 2026$0.00
$-195.00
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $70,000 on February 24?
1200 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-275.99
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $74,000 on March 10?
1180 shares @ 24.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 10, 2026$0.00
$-293.11
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in June?$32.81Jun 1, 23:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in June?$1.98Jun 1, 22:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in June?$9.00Jun 1, 22:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in June?$10.21Jun 1, 21:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in June?$2.62Jun 1, 21:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in June?$1.91Jun 1, 21:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in June?$34.43Jun 1, 20:58 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $70,000 in May?$176.74May 28, 18:35 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $70,000 in May?$67.49May 28, 18:34 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $70,000 in May?$3.41May 28, 18:33 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in May?$26.15May 18, 15:54 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 in May?$106.46May 18, 15:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $70,000 in May?$24.20May 6, 13:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $70,000 in May?$114.38May 6, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $70,000 in May?$100.05May 5, 13:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $70,000 in May?$221.19May 5, 13:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 in May?$74.69May 5, 13:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in May?$52.40May 5, 13:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 in May?$53.35May 5, 13:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $66,000 on March 28?$59.16Mar 26, 13:52 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $37.55
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 16, 21:12 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 1, 23:09 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".