Free-Donation
0x4f0b91a7bb9fb727a9ac5a6776863a6b995d1db9
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
11
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-459.54
Realised
$-1.54
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 11- OVER
Club Atlético de Madrid vs. Deportivo Alavés: O/U 1.5
252 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-126.16
- NO
Will Manchester United FC win on 2026-01-17?
202 shares @ 67.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-135.48
- OVER
Villarreal CF vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5
182 shares @ 54.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-99.36
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 17, 5AM ET
132 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- OVER
Villarreal CF vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 3.5
105 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- UP
Solana Up or Down - January 19, 4AM ET
104 shares @ 4.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down - January 18, 12PM ET
101 shares @ 19.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- DOWN
Solana Up or Down - January 20, 7AM ET
63 shares @ 6.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 17, 3PM ET
51 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 17, 6AM ET
29 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYVillarreal CF vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5$59.36Jan 24, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYVillarreal CF vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5$20.00Jan 24, 20:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYVillarreal CF vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 3.5$40.00Jan 24, 20:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYVillarreal CF vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5$20.00Jan 24, 20:14 UTC
- TRADESELLAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$57.31Jan 24, 19:10 UTC
- TRADESELLAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 3.5$61.61Jan 24, 19:09 UTC
- TRADESELL1. FC Union Berlin vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 2.5$20.44Jan 24, 19:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 3.5$48.54Jan 24, 18:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$20.00Jan 24, 18:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$20.00Jan 24, 18:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$20.00Jan 24, 18:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$20.00Jan 24, 18:32 UTC
- TRADESELLAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$51.55Jan 24, 18:17 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Union Berlin vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 2.5$20.00Jan 24, 18:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$28.12Jan 24, 17:44 UTC
- TRADESELLWest Ham United FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 4.5$28.11Jan 24, 14:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWest Ham United FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 4.5$67.16Jan 24, 13:23 UTC
- TRADESELLEthereum Up or Down - January 21, 7AM ET$10.20Jan 21, 12:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - January 21, 7AM ET$2.80Jan 21, 12:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - January 21, 7AM ET$0.45Jan 21, 12:21 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $27.88
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 17, 12:05 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 24, 20:29 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".