Demanding-Favorite
0x50c06f8fc8b149f5b398c7d3bd360913256beb7f
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-311.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will the get-in price for the 2026 World Cup Final be less than $6,000?
540 shares @ 14.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 16, 2026$0.00
$-75.56
- YES
Will the announcers say "Hattrick" or "Hat Trick" during the Argentina vs Spain FIFA World Cup Match?
490 shares @ 44.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 19, 2026$0.00
$-219.05
- DUCKS
Ducks vs. Sharks
30 shares @ 49.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-14.76
- YES
Will the get-in price for the 2026 World Cup Final be $6,000-$6,500?
30 shares @ 5.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 16, 2026$0.00
$-1.63
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill the announcers say "Handball" during the Argentina vs Spain FIFA World Cup Match?$99.98Jul 20, 12:12 UTC
- REDEEMWill the get-in price for the 2026 World Cup Final be at least $9,000?$270.00Jul 20, 12:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the announcers say "Handball" during the Argentina vs Spain FIFA World Cup Match?$66.88Jul 19, 12:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the get-in price for the 2026 World Cup Final be less than $6,000?$78.81Jul 19, 12:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the get-in price for the 2026 World Cup Final be at least $9,000?$11.05Jul 19, 12:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the get-in price for the 2026 World Cup Final be $6,000-$6,500?$1.71Jul 19, 12:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the get-in price for the 2026 World Cup Final be at least $9,000?$133.12Jul 19, 02:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the announcers say "Hattrick" or "Hat Trick" during the Argentina vs Spain FIFA World Cup Match?$223.90Jul 19, 01:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYDucks vs. Sharks$11.76Apr 1, 21:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYDucks vs. Sharks$3.00Apr 1, 11:35 UTC
- REDEEMJets vs. Blackhawks$30.00Apr 1, 06:22 UTC
- REDEEMMavericks vs. Bucks$0.00Apr 1, 04:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYMavericks vs. Bucks$12.30Apr 1, 00:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYJets vs. Blackhawks$17.10Apr 1, 00:25 UTC
- REDEEMBruins vs. Sabres$15.00Mar 26, 04:48 UTC
- REDEEMDucks vs. Canucks$30.00Mar 25, 07:34 UTC
- REDEEMOilers vs. Utah$15.00Mar 25, 07:18 UTC
- REDEEMCapitals vs. Blues$0.00Mar 25, 06:10 UTC
- REDEEMDevils vs. Stars$15.00Mar 25, 06:03 UTC
- REDEEMGolden Knights vs. Jets$0.00Mar 25, 06:02 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
14/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
31 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 51/100.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 31
- Avg trade size
- $25.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 24, 00:16 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 20, 12:12 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.