Moral-Savage
0x5166f19131b5bb4eb9820f9ba5e8ee211cd4f53c
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$6.66
Total PnL
$1.34
Realised
$0.67
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Houston be between 72-73°F on June 3?$4.99Jun 2, 20:25 UTC
- REDEEMStrait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of April?$0.00May 15, 13:10 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Seoul be 10°C on April 17?$3.93May 13, 12:21 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Chicago be 55°F or below on April 15?$152.14May 13, 12:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Seoul be 10°C on April 17?$3.93Apr 16, 08:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Chicago be 55°F or below on April 15?$152.00Apr 14, 06:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYStrait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of April?$1.00Apr 8, 10:12 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $40.48
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 8, 10:12 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 2, 20:25 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".