Oblong-Kidney
0x527717a7b2f72b7a07b6dc21b99a78499625614f
Activity score
66/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$69.97
Total PnL
$-145.65
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- OVER
Chelsea FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners
70 shares @ 45.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$69.97
$38.47
- OVER
Al Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5
354 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 2, 2026$0.00
$-169.84
- YES
Will Al Okhdood SC vs. Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club end in a draw?
95 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 20, 2026$0.00
$-14.28
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$32.021d ago
- REDEEMGwangju FC vs. Daejeon Hana Citizen FC: O/U 2.5$4.651d ago
- TRADEBUYGwangju FC vs. Daejeon Hana Citizen FC: O/U 2.5$2.034d ago
- REDEEMWill Botafogo FR win on 2026-02-25?$39.334d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Botafogo FR win on 2026-02-25?$35.8870d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Al Okhdood SC vs. Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club end in a draw?$14.2874d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$14.8891d ago
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC vs. NEOM SC: O/U 2.5$21.0491d ago
- REDEEMWill Al Fateh Saudi Club win on 2026-01-29?$120.7291d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Al Fateh Saudi Club win on 2026-01-29?$100.0096d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 16
- Avg trade size
- $22.13
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 96d ago
- Last active
- 1d ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".