Gentle-Surprise
0x58583b68398ea0a87a42122d7303b663b269dc6b
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
69
Open notional
$2.0K
Total PnL
$-32.4K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 69- OVER
Auckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5
1959 shares @ 51.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$2.0K
$959.81
- OVER
Nottingham Forest FC vs. Fenerbahçe SK: O/U 3.5
9692 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 26, 2026$0.00
$-3.0K
- OVER
Central Coast Mariners FC vs. Newcastle United Jets FC: O/U 3.5
4666 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-2.2K
- OVER
FC Viktoria Plzeň vs. Panathinaikós AO: O/U 2.5
3592 shares @ 41.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 26, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- OVER
Juventus FC vs. Galatasaray SK: O/U 3.5
2506 shares @ 28.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-716.65
- OVER
FC Augsburg vs. 1. FC Köln: O/U 3.5
2442 shares @ 28.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-696.82
- OVER
SS Lazio vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 2.5
2430 shares @ 41.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-1.0K
- OVER
Everton FC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 3.5
2048 shares @ 30.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 23, 2026$0.00
$-628.03
- OVER
FC Augsburg vs. 1. FC Köln: O/U 2.5
2017 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-968.35
- OVER
Western Sydney Wanderers FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5
1976 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2026$0.00
$-1.0K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCentral Coast Mariners FC vs. Newcastle United Jets FC: O/U 3.5$2.2KFeb 28, 06:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYCentral Coast Mariners FC vs. Newcastle United Jets FC: O/U 3.5$4.85Feb 28, 06:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYCentral Coast Mariners FC vs. Newcastle United Jets FC: O/U 3.5$0.96Feb 28, 06:10 UTC
- REDEEMWolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 1.5$5.1KFeb 28, 05:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$115.48Feb 27, 23:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$10.25Feb 27, 23:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$1.53Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$153.00Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$102.00Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$0.77Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$1.53Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$1.53Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$0.77Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$1.04Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$1.04Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$1.04Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$1.04Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$18.87Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$1.59Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Melbourne City FC: O/U 2.5$105.06Feb 27, 23:33 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $282.66
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 26, 20:12 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 28, 06:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".