Worn-Appreciation
0x59a740353346066e99da63bbcf2e223b910f880f
Wallet digest
Activity score
35/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-6.66
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will the price of $BTC be above $33,000 on February 1st, 2022?
10 shares @ 10.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2022$0.00
$-1.00
- NO
Will the U.S. 7-day COVID-19 Case average be below 100,000 by May 1, 2022?
9 shares @ 10.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 8, 2022$0.00
$-1.00
- NO
Will Trump’s Truth Social launch on the iOS app store by February 21st?
4 shares @ 82.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2022$0.00
$-3.66
- YES
Will MetaMask airdrop a native token by March 31st, 2022?
3 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2022$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMChess: Will Magnus Carlsen lose any regular game in the 2022 Tata Steel Masters?$3.66Feb 2, 03:34 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 0
- Avg trade size
- $0.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 2, 03:34 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 2, 03:34 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".