Reckless-Elevation
0x5b4ec9c06b284ee52c41a761974d836992880232
Activity score
64/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$31.91
Total PnL
$-81.6K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYAtlanta Braves vs. Los Angeles Dodgers: O/U 8.5$32.4K4h ago
- MAKER_REBATE$1.905h ago
- REDEEMSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$210.1K1d ago
- REDEEMDetroit Tigers vs. Kansas City Royals: O/U 8.5$12.0K1d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$29.861d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$154.971d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$10.201d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$1.041d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$265.411d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$1.041d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$5.201d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$32.271d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$9.6K1d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$36.5K1d ago
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves: O/U 216.5$60.9K1d ago
- MAKER_REBATE$123.471d ago
- REWARD$4.991d ago
- TRADEBUYColorado Rockies vs. Philadelphia Phillies: O/U 7.5$24.8K1d ago
- TRADEBUYColorado Rockies vs. Philadelphia Phillies: O/U 7.5$112.771d ago
- TRADEBUYColorado Rockies vs. Philadelphia Phillies: O/U 7.5$1.131d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 21
- Avg trade size
- $9.3K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 1d ago
- Last active
- 4h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
