Loving-Recipient
0x5cd8c83f2df1498ccebde0f595bf3a9c39d28789
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REWARD$0.48Jan 13, 15:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYSEC approves first spot Bitcoin ETF on Jan 10?$9.38Jan 10, 21:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYSEC approves first spot Bitcoin ETF on Jan 10?$1.07Jan 10, 21:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYSEC approves first spot Bitcoin ETF on Jan 10?$1.55Jan 10, 18:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYSEC approves first spot Bitcoin ETF on Jan 10?$230.29Jan 10, 18:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYSEC approves first spot Bitcoin ETF on Jan 10?$630.77Jan 10, 13:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYSEC approves first spot Bitcoin ETF on Jan 10?$200.00Jan 10, 13:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYSEC approves first spot Bitcoin ETF on Jan 10?$175.00Jan 10, 13:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Zelensky visit Israel by Nov 10?$68.94Nov 4, 12:59 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 8
- Avg trade size
- $164.63
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 4, 12:59 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 13, 15:17 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".