Dreary-Horror
0x5dfefa4ccccae080181f57c398d0d99dc3393ff2
Wallet digest
Activity score
64/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
78
Open notional
$5.00
Total PnL
$-184.17
Realised
$7.34
Win rate
67%
9 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 78- NO
Will the highest temperature in Chongqing be 16°C on April 13?
5 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$5.00
$0.05
- YI ZHOU
Wuning: Yi Zhou vs Kody Pearson
624 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 16, 2026$0.00
$-7.21
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Singapore be 27°C on April 10?
422 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$0.00
$-4.21
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Beijing be 14°C on April 13?
372 shares @ 1.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-6.28
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Beijing be 13°C or below on April 13?
205 shares @ 3.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-7.12
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Beijing be 16°C on April 13?
129 shares @ 5.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-7.24
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Wuhan be 17°C or below on April 13?
118 shares @ 3.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-4.29
- ENZO CAMARGO LIMA
Campinas: Juan Manuel La Serna vs Enzo Camargo Lima
101 shares @ 5.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-5.19
- JOHAN NIKLES
Campinas: Johan Nikles vs Gustavo Heide
94 shares @ 5.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 16, 2026$0.00
$-4.77
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Wellington be 16°C on April 8?
80 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 8, 2026$0.00
$-0.64
Recent activity
- REDEEMLiverpool FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 2.5$0.00Apr 12, 01:16 UTC
- MERGEWill the highest temperature in Beijing be 14°C on April 13?$5.00Apr 12, 01:14 UTC
- MERGEWill the highest temperature in Beijing be 13°C or below on April 13?$5.00Apr 12, 01:14 UTC
- REDEEMLiverpool FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 2.5$5.08Apr 12, 01:12 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Shanghai Haigang FC win on 2026-04-11?$4.80Apr 11, 12:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Chongqing be 16°C on April 13?$4.95Apr 11, 09:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 2.5$1.88Apr 11, 05:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$0.29Apr 11, 02:32 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Wolverhampton Wanderers FC (-2.5)$8.49Apr 11, 00:55 UTC
- REDEEMTSV Fortuna 95 Düsseldorf vs. Holstein Kiel: O/U 1.5$0.00Apr 10, 22:05 UTC
- REDEEMTSV Fortuna 95 Düsseldorf vs. Holstein Kiel: O/U 1.5$0.00Apr 10, 22:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 10, 6:00PM-6:05PM ET$10.00Apr 10, 22:03 UTC
- REDEEMTSV Fortuna 95 Düsseldorf vs. Holstein Kiel: O/U 1.5$4.97Apr 10, 22:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$0.15Apr 10, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$0.15Apr 10, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$0.15Apr 10, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$0.15Apr 10, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$0.15Apr 10, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$0.15Apr 10, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$0.15Apr 10, 20:01 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
22/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
67% win rate over 9 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
0/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
26 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 70/100.
9 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 26
- Avg trade size
- $3.30
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 10, 03:27 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 12, 01:16 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 9 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.