Parched-Beastie
0x5ee4fb3d5a81ed531fdc5fa79c8da42982879f0c
Wallet digest
Activity score
49/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
51
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-52.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 51- UNDER
Real Madrid CF vs. Real Betis Balompié: O/U 4.5
1899 shares @ 79.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- UNDER
Eintracht Frankfurt vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 4.5
1830 shares @ 82.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 9, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- UNDER
AFC Bournemouth vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 4.5
1786 shares @ 84.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- UNDER
Birmingham City FC vs. Coventry City FC: O/U 4.5
1744 shares @ 86.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- UNDER
Newcastle United FC vs. Leeds United FC: O/U 4.5
1724 shares @ 87.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- UNDER
FC Bayern München vs. VfL Wolfsburg: O/U 4.5
1667 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- UNDER
Everton FC vs. Brentford FC: O/U 4.5
1648 shares @ 91.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- UNDER
PSV vs. SBV Excelsior: O/U 4.5
1587 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 10, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- UNDER
Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs. VfB Stuttgart: O/U 4.5
1538 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 10, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- UNDER
Real Madrid CF vs. AS Monaco FC: O/U 4.5
1493 shares @ 67.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMHamburger SV vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 4.5$1.1KMar 6, 17:39 UTC
- REDEEMHull City AFC vs. Watford FC: O/U 4.5$0.00Feb 6, 17:15 UTC
- REDEEMHull City AFC vs. Watford FC: O/U 4.5$1.7KFeb 6, 17:15 UTC
- REDEEMParis FC vs. Angers SCO: O/U 4.5$1.1KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 4.5$1.1KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMBrentford FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 4.5$1.1KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMFC Utrecht vs. Sparta Rotterdam: O/U 4.5$1.1KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMFC Groningen vs. Fortuna Sittard: O/U 4.5$1.1KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMCrystal Palace FC vs. Chelsea FC: O/U 4.5$1.2KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMAtalanta BC vs. Parma Calcio 1913: O/U 4.5$1.2KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMClub Atlético de Madrid vs. RCD Mallorca: O/U 4.5$1.2KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMSC Freiburg vs. 1. FC Köln: O/U 4.5$1.2KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMNewcastle United FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 4.5$1.2KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMBorussia Mönchengladbach vs. VfB Stuttgart: O/U 4.5$1.2KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMFC Barcelona vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 4.5$1.6KJan 26, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMFC Schalke 04 vs. 1. FC Kaiserslautern: O/U 4.5$1.1KJan 25, 16:55 UTC
- REDEEMSC Paderborn 07 vs. SC Preußen Münster: O/U 4.5$1.2KJan 25, 16:55 UTC
- REDEEMSV 07 Elversberg vs. VfL Bochum: O/U 4.5$1.2KJan 25, 16:55 UTC
- REDEEMPortsmouth FC vs. Southampton FC: O/U 4.5$1.1KJan 25, 16:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYLille OSC vs. RC Strasbourg Alsace: O/U 4.5$1000.00Jan 25, 16:19 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 24
- Avg trade size
- $958.79
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 25, 10:34 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 6, 17:39 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".