Punctual-Battleship
0x5f0718ff03268ac06ab4623f755ea4d4d77f9d0f
Wallet digest
Activity score
41/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
197
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-80.1K
Realised
$-935.03
Win rate
29%
7 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 197- LINDA NOSKOVA
Bad Homburg Open: Gabriela Ruse vs Linda Noskova
5106 shares @ 65.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 29, 2026$0.00
$-3.4K
- SPURS
Spurs vs. Knicks
4300 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 11, 2026$0.00
$-2.7K
- DONNA VEKIC
Grass Court Championships: Donna Vekic vs Alexandra Eala
3900 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 22, 2026$0.00
$-2.1K
- MADISON KEYS
Grass Court Championships: Jessica Pegula vs Madison Keys
3600 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 26, 2026$0.00
$-1.7K
- VIT KOPRIVA
Prostejov: Vitaliy Sachko vs Vit Kopriva
3500 shares @ 77.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 11, 2026$0.00
$-2.7K
- NEW YORK YANKEES
New York Yankees vs. Boston Red Sox
2500 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 2, 2026$0.00
$-1.4K
- NAOMI OSAKA
Bad Homburg Open: Karolina Muchova vs Naomi Osaka
2300 shares @ 58.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.4K
- JAKUB MENSIK
HSBC Championships: Jakub Mensik vs Adrian Mannarino
2300 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 22, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- SPURS
Knicks vs. Spurs
2200 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 14, 2026$0.00
$-1.3K
- ZEYNEP SONMEZ
Nottingham Open: Viktorija Golubic vs Zeynep Sonmez
2086 shares @ 58.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 25, 2026$0.00
$-1.2K
Recent activity
- REDEEMMilwaukee Brewers vs. San Francisco Giants$2.1KJul 29, 05:08 UTC
- REDEEMMubadala Citi DC Open: Martin Damm vs Ben Shelton AND Mubadala Citi DC Open: Trevor Svajda vs Jakub Mensik$427.05Jul 29, 02:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYSeattle Mariners vs. Los Angeles Dodgers$1.4KJul 29, 01:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYMilwaukee Brewers vs. San Francisco Giants$1.2KJul 29, 01:56 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$3.51Jul 29, 00:45 UTC
- TAKER_REBATE$4.82Jul 29, 00:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYMubadala Citi DC Open: Martin Damm vs Ben Shelton AND Mubadala Citi DC Open: Trevor Svajda vs Jakub Mensik$250.00Jul 28, 20:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Tampa Bay Rays$442.25Jul 28, 20:12 UTC
- REDEEMLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$899.98Jul 28, 05:50 UTC
- REDEEMChicago Cubs vs. St. Louis Cardinals$999.99Jul 28, 04:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$307.21Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$1.56Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$1.83Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$1.56Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$4.72Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$1.83Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$4.88Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$3.05Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$22.87Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Cabos Open: Coleman Wong vs Darwin Blanch$183.00Jul 28, 04:20 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Needs review
32/100Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
29% win rate over 7 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
0/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
39 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 59/100.
7 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $231.82
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 24, 00:45 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 29, 05:08 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 7 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.