0x5f6a3af26c5864dc86e6827193827769717bb084
0x5f6a3af26c5864dc86e6827193827769717bb084
Activity score
82/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$89.77
Total PnL
$-0.05
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,250 on May 5?$4.996h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 18
- Avg trade size
- $4.99
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 6h ago
- Last active
- 6h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".