Aromatic-Skullduggery
0x62312592e07c8ca9aace42bc5299d058d5ad3f29
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
33
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-7.6K
Realised
$-59.04
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 33- CAZAUX
Hangzhou Open: Corentin Moutet vs Arthur Cazaux
1100 shares @ 74.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 27, 2025$0.00
$-824.00
- NO
Will Espanyol win on 2025-09-15?
1059 shares @ 47.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 15, 2025$0.00
$-506.55
- NO
Will Liverpool win on 2025-09-20?
1000 shares @ 34.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 20, 2025$0.00
$-345.00
- NO
Will Cagliari win on 2025-09-19?
948 shares @ 66.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 19, 2025$0.00
$-626.20
- NO
Will VfB Stuttgart win on 2025-09-19?
900 shares @ 47.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 19, 2025$0.00
$-427.50
- NO
Will Atletico Madrid win on 2025-09-24?
850 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 24, 2025$0.00
$-391.00
- NO
Will FC Twente '65 win on 2025-09-19?
837 shares @ 59.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 19, 2025$0.00
$-496.51
- NO
Will Manchester United win on 2025-09-20?
720 shares @ 16.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 20, 2025$0.00
$-115.20
- MARIA
Korea Open: Suzan Lamens vs Tatjana Maria
541 shares @ 39.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 23, 2025$0.00
$-215.98
- NO
Will LDU de Quito win on 2025-09-18?
510 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 18, 2025$0.00
$-265.42
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYShanghai Rolex Masters: Marin Cilic vs Novak Djokovic$9.57Oct 3, 11:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Atletico Madrid win on 2025-09-24?$391.00Sep 24, 20:27 UTC
- REDEEMJapan Open Tennis Championships: Marton Fucsovics vs Frances Tiafoe$400.00Sep 24, 20:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYChina Open: Anastasia Zakharova vs Shuai Zhang$121.80Sep 24, 11:50 UTC
- REDEEMJapan Open Tennis Championships: Daniel Altmaier vs Denis Shapovalov$100.00Sep 24, 11:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYJapan Open Tennis Championships: Marton Fucsovics vs Frances Tiafoe$64.00Sep 24, 10:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYJapan Open Tennis Championships: Marton Fucsovics vs Frances Tiafoe$159.00Sep 24, 08:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYJapan Open Tennis Championships: Daniel Altmaier vs Denis Shapovalov$60.00Sep 24, 08:08 UTC
- REDEEMWill Fluminense FC win on 2025-09-23?$300.00Sep 24, 08:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fluminense FC win on 2025-09-23?$45.00Sep 24, 01:20 UTC
- REDEEMWill Girona win on 2025-09-23?$47.62Sep 23, 23:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Racing Club win on 2025-09-23?$114.00Sep 23, 21:47 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Sevilla vs. Villarreal end in a draw?$99.89Sep 23, 21:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla vs. Villarreal end in a draw?$15.52Sep 23, 20:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla vs. Villarreal end in a draw?$11.20Sep 23, 20:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla vs. Villarreal end in a draw?$3.82Sep 23, 20:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla vs. Villarreal end in a draw?$25.45Sep 23, 20:44 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Villarreal win on 2025-09-23?$67.00Sep 23, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Villarreal win on 2025-09-23?$30.15Sep 23, 20:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Villarreal win on 2025-09-23?$36.85Sep 23, 20:29 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $56.78
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Sep 21, 19:36 UTC
- Last active
- Oct 3, 11:34 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".