0x6321c9f4f75fd99f17ee66929f5320b38dd762bb
0x6321c9f4f75fd99f17ee66929f5320b38dd762bb
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-51.97
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSeattle Sounders FC vs. Los Angeles Galaxy: O/U 2.5$25.96May 17, 02:08 UTC
- REDEEMWill VfB Stuttgart win on 2026-05-16?$26.61May 17, 00:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill VfB Stuttgart win on 2026-05-16?$8.96May 16, 13:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYVancouver Whitecaps FC vs. Real Salt Lake: O/U 1.5$26.01Feb 22, 02:20 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be above $68,000 on February 14?$1.11Feb 18, 01:51 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down on February 14?$1.16Feb 18, 01:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down on February 14?$1.00Feb 14, 14:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $68,000 on February 14?$1.00Feb 14, 05:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $12.59
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 14, 05:25 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 02:08 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".