Harmonious-Yoga
0x644fbb97955b6533745ef447751a36a37f0b8bc9
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-23.4K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- SPIRIT
BLAST Open: Spirit vs. G2
13328 shares @ 75.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 2, 2025$0.00
$-10.0K
- THUNDERTALK GAMING
LoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs
7000 shares @ 56.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.9K
- TEAM WE
League of Legends: Team WE vs. Edward Gaming
5000 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 1, 2025$0.00
$-3.3K
- NONGSHIM RED FORCE
LoL: DN SOOPers vs Nongshim Red Force - Game 1 Winner
3900 shares @ 52.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 28, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- GEN.G
LoL: Anyone's Legend vs Gen.G (BO1)
3302 shares @ 68.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 16, 2025$0.00
$-2.2K
- YES
Will FC Kopenhagen win on 2025-10-01?
2072 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 1, 2025$0.00
$-973.73
- T1
LoL: T1 vs KT Rolster - Game 3 Winner
1000 shares @ 57.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-577.52
- BFX
LoL: DK vs BFX
534 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 24, 2025$0.00
$-112.06
- T1
LoL: T1 vs KT Rolster - Game 2 Winner
443 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-279.25
- YES
Will Newcastle win on 2025-08-30?
5 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 30, 2025$0.00
$-2.36
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$7.34Jun 4, 00:45 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 3 Winner$477.55Jun 3, 21:22 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 Winner$10.4KJun 3, 21:22 UTC
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 23.5 in Game 3?$30.93Jun 3, 11:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 3 Winner$412.41Jun 3, 11:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 Winner$283.96Jun 3, 10:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 Winner$7.3KJun 3, 10:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 Winner$809.09Jun 3, 10:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 Winner$773.65Jun 3, 10:13 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$12.90Jun 3, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$49.93Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$129.56Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$36.67Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$16.50Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$611.11Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$122.22Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$4.89Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$1.32Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$36.67Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Playoffs$60.74Jun 2, 13:05 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 42
- Avg trade size
- $454.77
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 28, 09:18 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 4, 00:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".