Scratchy-Popcorn
0x64a6768aef9350d2a1e10310c9950ac6b3c2cab3
Activity score
57/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$17.20
Total PnL
$-15.80
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Chengdu be 21°C on May 2?
59 shares @ 17.0¢·now 15.5¢·exp May 2, 2026$9.10
$-0.90
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Chengdu be 22°C on May 2?
34 shares @ 29.0¢·now 23.5¢·exp May 2, 2026$8.10
$-1.90
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Chengdu be 19°C on May 1?
81 shares @ 6.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Chengdu be 23°C on April 30?
24 shares @ 34.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-8.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Chengdu be 22°C on May 2?$10.351h ago
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Chengdu be 21°C on May 2?$10.411h ago
- TRADESELLWill the highest temperature in Chengdu be 20°C on May 1?$67.2610h ago
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Chengdu be 19°C on May 1?$5.231d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Chengdu be 23°C on April 30?$8.262d ago
- TRADESELLWill the highest temperature in Chengdu be 23°C on April 29?$42.072d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Chengdu be 23°C on April 29?$7.893d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $21.64
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 3d ago
- Last active
- 1h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".