Insignificant-Snarl
0x6538c460c516820fae8c3438d134e9e051a406a3
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
63
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-389.71
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 63- YES
Exact Score: Levante UD 0 - 1 Getafe CF?
262 shares @ 13.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-34.09
- YES
Exact Score: FC Bayern München 2 - 3 Real Madrid CF?
147 shares @ 3.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-4.85
- YES
Exact Score: Levante UD 1 - 2 Getafe CF?
146 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-14.59
- YES
Exact Score: Levante UD 0 - 0 Getafe CF?
139 shares @ 14.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-19.48
- YES
Exact Score: RCD Mallorca 0 - 3 Rayo Vallecano de Madrid?
135 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-0.97
- HEAT
Heat vs. Hornets
130 shares @ 11.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$0.00
$-15.58
- YES
Exact Score: FC Bayern München 0 - 2 Real Madrid CF?
121 shares @ 2.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-2.91
- YES
Exact Score: FC Bayern München 0 - 3 Real Madrid CF?
121 shares @ 1.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-1.94
- YES
Exact Score: Liverpool FC 3 - 2 Paris Saint-Germain FC?
97 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$0.00
$-4.86
- YES
Exact Score: FC Bayern München 0 - 1 Real Madrid CF?
92 shares @ 2.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-1.94
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Pistons$1.00Apr 23, 00:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Nuggets$1.00Apr 18, 20:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWarriors vs. Suns$3.00Apr 18, 02:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYHornets vs. Magic$2.00Apr 18, 00:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Internazionale Milano 2 - 2 Cagliari Calcio?$1.00Apr 17, 15:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Internazionale Milano 3 - 2 Cagliari Calcio?$1.00Apr 17, 15:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Internazionale Milano 3 - 1 Cagliari Calcio?$1.00Apr 17, 15:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Internazionale Milano 2 - 1 Cagliari Calcio?$1.00Apr 17, 15:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Internazionale Milano 2 - 0 Cagliari Calcio?$1.00Apr 17, 15:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Internazionale Milano 1 - 1 Cagliari Calcio?$1.00Apr 17, 15:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Internazionale Milano 1 - 0 Cagliari Calcio?$1.00Apr 17, 15:40 UTC
- TRADESELLPaul George: Points O/U 20.5$9.04Apr 16, 02:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. 76ers: O/U 219.5$1.00Apr 16, 01:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYPaul George: Points O/U 20.5$5.00Apr 15, 21:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYTyrese Maxey: Points O/U 29.5$5.00Apr 15, 21:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. 76ers: O/U 219.5$10.00Apr 15, 21:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 15, 1:30PM-1:35PM ET$1.00Apr 15, 17:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Bayern München 0 - 3 Real Madrid CF?$2.00Apr 15, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Bayern München 0 - 2 Real Madrid CF?$3.00Apr 15, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Bayern München 3 - 3 Real Madrid CF?$2.00Apr 15, 16:33 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $5.84
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 14, 14:30 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 23, 00:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".