Yearly-Jodhpurs
0x6546e1e80c558737fab52e206a2bcf86bf2d4e0e
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-17.94
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the match be a draw?$5.00Jun 24, 09:05 UTC
- TRADESELLBlast airdrop by June 30?$5.00Jun 24, 09:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Netherlands win?$12.94Jun 21, 09:20 UTC
- REDEEMWill the match be a draw? $0.00Jun 21, 09:20 UTC
- REDEEMLayerZero airdrop by June 30?$0.00Jun 21, 09:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the match be a draw? $20.00Jun 20, 10:24 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Germany win the 2024 Euros?$18.66Jun 20, 10:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Germany win the 2024 Euros?$16.00Jun 18, 09:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYLayerZero airdrop by June 30?$30.00Jun 8, 10:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYBlast airdrop by June 30?$15.00Jun 5, 19:14 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 8
- Avg trade size
- $15.33
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jun 5, 19:14 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 24, 09:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".