Accurate-Subject
0x658d89fe86e60704cc4817c2918455e71bbd859f
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
38
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.8K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 38- NO
Will edgeX launch a token in 2025?
3571 shares @ 55.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- YES
Will Chelsea FC win on 2025-11-05?
419 shares @ 74.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 5, 2025$0.00
$-310.12
- YES
Will Montpellier HSC win on 2026-01-05?
400 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 5, 2026$0.00
$-156.00
- YES
Will Lille OSC win on 2025-11-06?
394 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 6, 2025$0.00
$-165.29
- YES
Will Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2025-11-05?
369 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 5, 2025$0.00
$-192.00
- YES
Will Tottenham win on 2025-11-08?
365 shares @ 13.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 8, 2025$0.00
$-50.00
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-01-08?
339 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 8, 2026$0.00
$-50.69
- YES
Will OGC Nice win on 2025-11-09?
323 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-142.18
- YES
Will Real Sociedad win on 2025-11-07?
274 shares @ 36.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 7, 2025$0.00
$-99.73
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-01-04?
271 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-140.80
Recent activity
- TRADESELLSolstice FDV above $200M one day after launch?$82.07May 26, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolstice FDV above $200M one day after launch?$44.60May 19, 12:11 UTC
- REDEEMArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 3.5$45.05May 19, 02:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 3.5$26.01May 18, 14:13 UTC
- TRADESELLCD Concepción vs. Everton de Viña del Mar: O/U 2.5$25.90May 18, 00:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYCD Concepción vs. Everton de Viña del Mar: O/U 2.5$48.94May 18, 00:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYInter Miami CF vs. Portland Timbers: O/U 2.5$50.51May 17, 23:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill BV Borussia 09 Dortmund win on 2026-01-09?$99.63Jan 9, 16:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-01-08?$50.69Jan 8, 21:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-01-08?$63.00Jan 8, 21:37 UTC
- REDEEMUS Cremonese vs. Cagliari Calcio: Both Teams to Score$113.70Jan 8, 21:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score$100.00Jan 8, 16:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Cremonese vs. Cagliari Calcio: Both Teams to Score$52.30Jan 8, 16:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: Both Teams to Score$50.00Jan 8, 16:07 UTC
- REDEEMWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-01-07?$102.09Jan 8, 16:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-01-07?$19.00Jan 7, 22:11 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Everton FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC end in a draw?$24.98Jan 7, 22:04 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Brentford FC win on 2026-01-07?$94.24Jan 7, 22:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Everton FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC end in a draw?$6.75Jan 7, 14:36 UTC
- TRADESELLRussia x Ukraine ceasefire by January 31, 2026?$6.75Jan 7, 14:35 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $116.08
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 26, 17:10 UTC
- Last active
- May 26, 16:58 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".