Apprehensive-Splendor
0x65f53ae74c0cf428af849674c96c26f3ab0e47c7
Wallet digest
Activity score
64/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
72
Open notional
$24.76
Total PnL
$-271.86
Realised
$-0.06
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 72- YES
Will England win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
45 shares @ 11.2¢·now 11.5¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$5.11
$0.11
- YES
Will Argentina win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
57 shares @ 8.8¢·now 8.9¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$5.09
$0.09
- YES
Will Brazil win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
60 shares @ 8.4¢·now 8.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$4.97
$-0.03
- YES
Will Portugal win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
52 shares @ 9.6¢·now 9.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$4.87
$-0.13
- YES
Will Croatia win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
556 shares @ 0.9¢·now 0.9¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$4.72
$-0.28
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $74,000 on May 19?
500 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Paris be 23°C or higher on May 3?
361 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-2.50
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Paris be 12°C on May 5?
208 shares @ 1.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 5, 2026$0.00
$-2.50
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Seoul be 27°C or higher on May 14?
155 shares @ 38.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$0.00
$-60.00
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Paris be 22°C on May 3?
151 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-2.99
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - June 4, 2:45AM-2:50AM ET$1.07Jun 4, 06:48 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - June 4, 2:40AM-2:45AM ET$53.57Jun 4, 06:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - June 4, 2:40AM-2:45AM ET$30.92Jun 4, 06:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - June 4, 2:35AM-2:40AM ET$1.07Jun 4, 06:38 UTC
- YIELD$0.00Jun 4, 00:11 UTC
- TRADESELLXRP Up or Down - June 3, 4:25PM-4:30PM ET$2.63Jun 3, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - June 3, 4:25PM-4:30PM ET$10.32Jun 3, 20:26 UTC
- TRADESELLXRP Up or Down - June 3, 4:05PM-4:10PM ET$10.11Jun 3, 20:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - June 3, 4:05PM-4:10PM ET$10.10Jun 3, 20:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - June 3, 3:30PM-3:35PM ET$10.37Jun 3, 19:34 UTC
- TRADESELLXRP Up or Down - June 3, 2:55PM-3:00PM ET$9.89Jun 3, 19:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - June 3, 3:00PM-3:05PM ET$9.95Jun 3, 19:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - June 3, 2:55PM-3:00PM ET$5.07Jun 3, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - June 3, 2:50PM-2:55PM ET$0.00Jun 3, 18:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - June 3, 2:50PM-2:55PM ET$3.82Jun 3, 18:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - June 3, 2:40PM-2:45PM ET$1.07Jun 3, 18:44 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - June 2, 8:10PM-8:15PM ET$0.01Jun 3, 00:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - June 2, 8:10PM-8:15PM ET$10.13Jun 3, 00:14 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin Up or Down - June 2, 8:10PM-8:15PM ET$12.74Jun 3, 00:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - June 2, 8:10PM-8:15PM ET$10.33Jun 3, 00:13 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $10.67
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jun 2, 23:27 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 4, 06:48 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".